Dozier v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dozier v. Thomas

129 S.E. 798, 34 Ga. App. 445, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 301

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 6, 1925

Docket16549

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 798 (Dozier v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dozier v. Thomas, 129 S.E. 798, 34 Ga. App. 445, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 301 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict.

Upon the authority of Sanders v. Ayers, 155 Ga. 630 (117 S. E. 651), and under the particular facts of this case, the assignments of error upon the admission of parol evidence to explain the indorsement by Thomas, who was sued as indorser of the notes, show no reversible error. For none of the reasons pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI