Dozier v. State

148 S.E. 589, 168 Ga. 670, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1929
DocketNo. 7138
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 589 (Dozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dozier v. State, 148 S.E. 589, 168 Ga. 670, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1929).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Jeff Dozier was convicted of murder without recommendation by the jury, and was sentenced to be electrocuted. A motion for a new trial was made_upon the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence. A further ground was added by amend[671]*671ment, based on alleged newly discovered evidence. The exception is to the judgment refusing a new trial.

No. 7138. June 12, 1929. Harris & Harris and J. F. Kelly, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, and T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra.

1. The original grounds of the motion for a new trial were conceded to be without merit, and were abandoned in the brief of the attorneys for the plaintiff in error.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative and impeaching in character, and was not such as would probably produce a different result if a new trial should be granted.

3. The judge did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamm v. Wilson
151 S.E. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 589, 168 Ga. 670, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-state-ga-1929.