Dozier v. State

837 So. 2d 252, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 464, 2001 WL 1637384
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 21, 2001
Docket1001571
StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 252 (Dozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dozier v. State, 837 So. 2d 252, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 464, 2001 WL 1637384 (Ala. 2001).

Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice.

On April 20, 2001, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, by unpublished memo[253]*253randum, Arria R. Dozier’s convictions and sentences for discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle and for assault in the second degree. Dozier v. State, (No. CR-99-2197) 836 So.2d 999 (Ala.Crim.App.2001) (table). In its unpublished memorandum the Court of Criminal Appeals declined to address the double-jeopardy issue raised by Dozier, because, it said, his motion asserting his double-jeopardy argument was untimely. We remand this ease for the Court of Criminal Appeals to address Dozier’s claims that his convictions and sentences for discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle and for second-degree assault violated constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy. We reserve judgment on the merits of the petitioner’s arguments until the Court of Criminal Appeals responds to our remand.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 252, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 464, 2001 WL 1637384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-state-ala-2001.