Dozier v. Skalsky

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 14, 2009
• Docket: 09-1553
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1553

NATHANIEL E. DOZIER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DOZIER & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY J. SKALSKY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00015-JRS)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Richard Cranwell, CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, Mark Quentin Emick, Jr., CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Vinton, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his civil action against Jerry Skalsky, a

member of the Board of Supervisors of Prince George County,

Virginia. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Dozier v. Skalsky, No. 3:09-cv-00015-JRS (E.D.

Va. Apr. 28, 2009). We deny Appellee’s motion to dismiss the

appeal or disregard Dozier’s informal reply brief. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED