Dozier v. Simmons

169 F. App'x 160
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2006
DocketNo. 05-7123
StatusPublished

This text of 169 F. App'x 160 (Dozier v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dozier v. Simmons, 169 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Angela Maria Dozier seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing two defendants from her civil action and proceeding with the remaining defendant. This court [161]*161may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Dozier seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F. App'x 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-simmons-ca4-2006.