Dozier v. Sanders

441 F. App'x 975
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6397
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 441 F. App'x 975 (Dozier v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dozier v. Sanders, 441 F. App'x 975 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jabari Dozier appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Dozier’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dozier v. Sanders, No. 3:09-cv-02309-JMC, 2011 WL 846698 (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2011). We grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 538 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F. App'x 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-sanders-ca4-2011.