Dozier v. Parker

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 14, 2009
• Docket: 09-1560
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1560

NATHANIEL E. DOZIER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HENRY PARKER; WILLIAM A. ROBERTSON, JR.; JOSEPH A. LEMING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00019-JRS)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Richard Cranwell, CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, Mark Quentin Emick, Jr., CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Vinton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against

Henry Parker and William A. Robertson, Jr., members of the Board

of Supervisors of Prince George County, Virginia, and Joseph A.

Leming, a former member. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Dozier v. Parker, No. 3:09-cv-

00019-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2009). We deny the Appellees’

motion to dismiss the appeal or disregard Dozier’s informal

reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED