Dozier v. Franklin County Jail

Fourth Circuit

Dozier v. Franklin County Jail

143 F. App'x 557

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 2005

DocketNo. 05-6689

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 557 (Dozier v. Franklin County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dozier v. Franklin County Jail, 143 F. App'x 557 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Angela Maria Dozier appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dozier v. Franklin County Jail, No. CA-05-171-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Angela Maria Dozier appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dozier v. Franklin County Jail, No. CA-05-171-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 F. App'x 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-franklin-county-jail-ca4-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack