Dozier v. Franklin County Government

132 F. App'x 487
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2005
DocketNo. 05-1222
StatusPublished

This text of 132 F. App'x 487 (Dozier v. Franklin County Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dozier v. Franklin County Government, 132 F. App'x 487 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Angela Maria Dozier appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dozier v. Franklin County Gov’t, No. CA-04-847-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the [488]*488decisional process. The motion to appoint counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 F. App'x 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-franklin-county-government-ca4-2005.