Dozier v. Chipman

California Supreme Court

Dozier v. Chipman

210 Cal. 668

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 30, 1930

DocketS. F. No. 13123

StatusPublished

This text of 210 Cal. 668 (Dozier v. Chipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dozier v. Chipman, 210 Cal. 668 (Cal. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

- THE COURT.

This is a companion case to the action of Davis v. Chipman (S. F. No. 13122), ante, p. 609 [293 Pac. 40], this day decided. In that'action the facts involved in the present action are fully set forth as well as the nature of the plaintiff’s demand. It is not necessary to repeat them here. Upon the authority of Davis v. Chipman, supra, the judgment herein is reversed.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Preston, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

- THE COURT.

This is a companion case to the action of Davis v. Chipman (S. F. No. 13122), ante, p. 609 [293 Pac. 40], this day decided. In that'action the facts involved in the present action are fully set forth as well as the nature of the plaintiff’s demand. It is not necessary to repeat them here. Upon the authority of Davis v. Chipman, supra, the judgment herein is reversed.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Preston, J., dissented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 Cal. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dozier-v-chipman-cal-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack