Doyon, Limited v. The Aleut Corporation

Ninth Circuit

Doyon, Limited v. The Aleut Corporation

580 F.2d 1010

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 7, 1978

Docket77-1481

StatusPublished

This text of 580 F.2d 1010 (Doyon, Limited v. The Aleut Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doyon, Limited v. The Aleut Corporation, 580 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

After due consideration and since the single issue raised in this appeal is identical to the issue raised and decided by our opinion filed in Doyon, Ltd. v. Bristol Bay Native Corp., No. 76-3658, Doyon, Ltd. v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp., No. 76-3681, Doyon, Ltd. v. Calista Corp., No. 76-3682, Doyon, Ltd. v. Koniag, Inc., No. 76-3683, Doyon, Ltd. v. Nana Regional Corp., Inc., No. 76-3684, Doyon, Ltd. v. Sealaska Corp., No. 76-3685, Doyon, Ltd. v. Cook Inlet Region, No. 76-3710, Doyon, Ltd. v. Ahtna, Inc., No. 76-3754, Doyon, Ltd. v. 13th Regional Corp., No. 76-3748, Doyon, Ltd. v. Chugach Natives, Inc., No. 77-1166, Doyon, Ltd. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior; W. Michael Blumenthal, Secretary of the Treasury, 569 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1978) (The Eleven Appeals), with which this appeal was consolidated by order of this court filed on March 18,1977,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, nunc pro tunc, that the decision of this court filed on February 3, 1978 in The Eleven Appeals shall be applicable to this appeal as fully as though The Aleut Corporation had perfected and prosecuted its appeal herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After due consideration and since the single issue raised in this appeal is identical to the issue raised and decided by our opinion filed in Doyon, Ltd. v. Bristol Bay Native Corp., No. 76-3658, Doyon, Ltd. v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp., No. 76-3681, Doyon, Ltd. v. Calista Corp., No. 76-3682, Doyon, Ltd. v. Koniag, Inc., No. 76-3683, Doyon, Ltd. v. Nana Regional Corp., Inc., No. 76-3684, Doyon, Ltd. v. Sealaska Corp., No. 76-3685, Doyon, Ltd. v. Cook Inlet Region, No. 76-3710, Doyon, Ltd. v. Ahtna, Inc., No. 76-3754, Doyon, Ltd. v. 13th Regional Corp., No. 76-3748, Doyon, Ltd. v. Chugach Natives, Inc., No. 77-1166, Doyon, Ltd. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior; W. Michael Blumenthal, Secretary of the Treasury, 569 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1978) (The Eleven Appeals), with which this appeal was consolidated by order of this court filed on March 18,1977,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, nunc pro tunc, that the decision of this court filed on February 3, 1978 in The Eleven Appeals shall be applicable to this appeal as fully as though The Aleut Corporation had perfected and prosecuted its appeal herein.

Doyon, Limited v. Bristol Bay Native Corp., Doyon, Limited v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp., Doyon, Limited v. Calista Corp., Doyon, Limited v. Koniag, Inc., Doyon, Limited v. Nana Regional Corp., Inc., Doyon, Limited v. Sealaska Corp., Doyon, Limited v. Cook Inlet Region, Doyon, Limited v. Ahtna, Inc., Doyon, Limited v. 13th Regional Corp., Doyon, Limited v. Chugach Natives, Inc., Doyon, Limited v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior and W. Michael Blumenthal, Secretary of the Treasury

569 F.2d 491 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 F.2d 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyon-limited-v-the-aleut-corporation-ca9-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack