Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar

894 So. 2d 875, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 38, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 50, 2005 WL 107093
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 20, 2005·No. No. SC03-359·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar, 838 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decision in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So.2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which this Court subsequently approved in Sarkis v. Allstate Insurance Co., 863 So.2d 210 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Sarkis.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar, 894 So. 2d 875, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 38, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 50, 2005 WL 107093 (Fla. 2005).

894 So. 2d 875 (Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar
838 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sarkis
809 So. 2d 6 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Sarkis v. Allstate Ins. Co.
863 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)