Doyle v. Willoughby
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6676
BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, Sr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLON WILLOUGHBY; DETECTIVE KENNON; OFFICER TORRANCE; S. P. BARDY, Detective; CAPITAL FORD; JEFFREY P. MANN; MACTEC ENGINEERING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03121-BO)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr. appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Doyle v. Willoughby, No. 5:06-ct-03121-BO
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle v. Willoughby (Doyle v. Willoughby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.