Doyle v. Willoughby

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2007·No. 07-6676·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6676

BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, Sr.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COLON WILLOUGHBY; DETECTIVE KENNON; OFFICER TORRANCE; S. P. BARDY, Detective; CAPITAL FORD; JEFFREY P. MANN; MACTEC ENGINEERING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03121-BO)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr. appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Doyle v. Willoughby, No. 5:06-ct-03121-BO

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doyle v. Willoughby, (4th Cir. 2007).

Doyle v. Willoughby (Doyle v. Willoughby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related