Doyle v. W. L. Douglas Shoe Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doyle v. W. L. Douglas Shoe Co.

87 N.Y.S. 1133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.Y.S. 1133 (Doyle v. W. L. Douglas Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doyle v. W. L. Douglas Shoe Co., 87 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment modified, by inserting provision therein allowing plaintiff costs of the demurrer as a condition for permitting defendant to answer, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of both appeals to the plaintiff, on the authority of Tallman v. Bernhard, 75 Hun, 30, 27 N. Y. Supp. 6, and Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Co., 79 Hun, 392, 29 N. Y. Supp. 783, affirmed 143 N. Y. 665, 39 N. E. 20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment modified, by inserting provision therein allowing plaintiff costs of the demurrer as a condition for permitting defendant to answer, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of both appeals to the plaintiff, on the authority of Tallman v. Bernhard, 75 Hun, 30, 27 N. Y. Supp. 6, and Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Co., 79 Hun, 392, 29 N. Y. Supp. 783, affirmed 143 N. Y. 665, 39 N. E. 20.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-w-l-douglas-shoe-co-nyappdiv-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack