Doyle v. Tolan
This text of Doyle v. Tolan (Doyle v. Tolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
EN I ERE D FEB 1 2 2015
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-14-030 N~-(Att'Y\- D~-V3 -IS MICHAEL DOYLE,
Plaintiff ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT v. ON THE PLEADINGS
EDWARD TOLAN, Chief, Falmouth Police Department,
Defendant
Before the court is defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Defendant argues that plaintiff lacks standing, the complaint fails to state a
claim, and the case is not ripe for judicial resolution. For the following reasons,
the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a resident of the Town of Falmouth, alleges that defendant has
purchased police vehicles without following certain competitive bidding
procedures. (Compl. <[<[ 1-2.) He seeks an injunction that requires defendant to
solicit sealed bids from other dealers and open the bids in a supervised, public
forum. (Compl. <[ 3.)
DISCUSSION
1. Standing
A taxpayer of a town has standing to seek preventative relief without
showing a particularized injury. Lehigh v. Pittston Co., 456 A.2d 355, 358 (Me.
1983). In his complaint, plaintiff does not allege a direct injury and does not allege he is a taxpayer. "[T]he failure to allege taxpayer status deprives plaintiffs
of their right to request even preventive relief." Heald v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No.
Z1, 387 A.2d 1, 4-5 (Me. 1978).
2. Failure to State a Claim
A motion for judgment on the pleadings tests the legal sufficiency of the
complaint. Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506, 510 (Me. 1996). Similar to a
motion to dismiss, the court must determine whether plaintiff "alleges the
elements of a cause of action or facts entitling the plaintiff to relief on some legal
theory." Cunningham v. Haza, 538 A.2d 265, 267 (Me. 1988).
Plaintiff asks the court to require defendant to follow a specific set of
competitive bidding procedures for the purchase of police vehicles. (Compl. The only authority plaintiff relies on is a Town of Falmouth document titled "Purchasing Guidelines and Policy." 1 (Pl.'s Ex. A.) It is unlikely these guidelines, unlike an ordinance, are judicially enforceable. Assuming that they are enforceable, however, pursuant to the Town Charter, "the Town Manager acts as the Purchasing Agent (not Director) for all departments of the Town, except the School Department." (Pl.'s Ex. A 1, The term "Chief of Police" does not appear in the guidelines. 1 The court may consider this document on a motion for judgment on the pleadings because it is a public document and appears central to plaintiff's claim. See Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Comm'n, 2004 ME 20, <[ 10, 843 A.2d 43. The document is not authenticated and appears to be missing pages. 2 Further, plaintiff does not allege any specific violation of the purchasing guidelines and policy. (Compl. '1[ 3.) Plaintiff points to no provisions that support plaintiff's proposed requirements. Plaintiff asks the court to impose specific procedures on an unscheduled event. Unlike in other cases in which a plaintiff was permitted to pursue prospective and preventative relief, there is no "genuine controversy between the parties that presents a concrete, certain, and immediate legal problem" and no "concrete and specific" legal dispute with a "direct, immediate and continuing impact" on the affected party in this case. See Johnson v. City of Augusta, 2006 ME 92, '1['1[ 7-8, 902 A.2d 855; see also Lehigh, 456 A.2d at 359 (plaintiff sought to prevent future sale of an airport based on option agreement and amendments previously signed). CONCLUSION Plaintiff lacks standing, has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and has not presented a genuine controversy. The defendant's motion is granted. The entry is Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's Complaint. .. Dated: February 3, 2015 cy Mills Justice, Superior Court 3 CLERK OF COURTS Cumberland County 205 Newbury Street, Ground Floor Portland, ME 04101 WILLIAM PLOUFFE ESQ DRUMMOND WOODSUM I:t~e n& onts 1-\ i-b c- ne CLERK OF COURTS Cumberland County 205 Newbury Street, Ground Floor Portland, ME 041 01 MICHAEL DOYLE 3 SHADY LANE ?(o s~ ~\u.:",·.~ FALMOUTH ME 041053. Ripeness
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doyle v. Tolan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-tolan-mesuperct-2015.