Doyle v. State
286 S.W. 214
Opinion
The offense is the possession of equipment for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.
The absence of the sentence which constitutes the final judgment from which an appeal may be taken precludes a consideration of 'the appeal on its merits. The final judgment is essential to confer jurisdiction upon this court. See Vernon’s Tex. Crim. Stat. vol. 2, p. 870, and authorities cited; also article 767, C. C. P. 1925.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle v. State, 286 S.W. 214 (Tex. 1926).
286 S.W. 214 (Doyle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alvarez v. State
51 S.W.2d 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Montalvo v. State
56 S.W.2d 184 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Worth v. State
12 S.W.2d 582 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Shepherd v. State
10 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Butler v. State
8 S.W.2d 183 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Pierce v. State
2 S.W.2d 461 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)