Doyle v. State of Arizona

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

CAMERON MICHAEL DOYLE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. SA-25-CV-00701-JKP

STATE OF ARIZONA,

Defendant.

ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad recommending this case be dismissed pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), his case should be dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief. ECF No. 7. Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations must serve and file all written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no party objects to a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court need only review the Magistrate Judge’s report to determine whether the findings and rec- ommendations are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Johnson v. Sw. Research Inst., 210 F. Supp. 3d 863, 864 (W.D. Tex. 2016) (citing U.S. v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989)). No party filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so passed. This Court, therefore, reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s report as its own, and ORDERS this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim for relief. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case.

It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 10th day of September, 2025. C\ NO ALLEN : VAALLANV\ JASON PULLIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE