Doyle v. State
77 So. 3d 817, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19, 2012 WL 10845
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doyle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 So. 3d 32 →
Opinion
The defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 was denied by the trial court. Because the motion challenges the defendant’s conviction rather than his sentence, we treat his motion as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Rivas v. State, 43 So.3d 154, 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Hilbert v. State, 661 So.2d 895, 895-96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The motion was untimely on its face and thus properly denied.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle v. State, 77 So. 3d 817, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19, 2012 WL 10845 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
77 So. 3d 817 (Doyle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rivas v. State
43 So. 3d 154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Hilbert v. State
661 So. 2d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)