Doyle v. State

979 So. 2d 1029, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3446, 2008 WL 649192
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 2008
DocketNo. 3D07-3230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 979 So. 2d 1029 (Doyle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doyle v. State, 979 So. 2d 1029, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3446, 2008 WL 649192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

WELLS, J.

On December 17, 2007, Robert J. Doyle filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus with this court seeking to compel the lower court to rule on his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Pursuant to an order of this court, the State responded that the criminal court docket sheet indicated that such a motion was filed on March 5, 2007, but that neither the trial court nor the State was in possession of the motion. The State also asked that this court recommend to the Department of Corrections that Doyle be sanctioned for filing numerous, frivolous collateral criminal proceedings with respect to his convictions and sentences in this case.

Based on the State’s representations that Doyle’s post-conviction motion cannot be located, we deny the petition without prejudice to file a new post-conviction mo[1030]*1030tion in the lower court. We decline to recommend to the Department of Corrections that it sanction the defendant at this time. However, upon reviewing the recent flurry of meritless, successive, pro se filings challenging his convictions and sentences in this case, we caution the defendant that the continued filing of frivolous or abusive papers may not only result in a future recommendation to the Department of Corrections that it bring disciplinary procedures against him under paragraph 944.28(2)(a) and section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2007), but also a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this court. See O’Haver v. State, 944 So.2d 498 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Johnson v. State, 915 So.2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barber v. State
979 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
979 So. 2d 1029, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3446, 2008 WL 649192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.