Doyle v. Seawall

California Supreme Court

Doyle v. Seawall

12 Cal. 425

DecidedJanuary 15, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Cal. 425 (Doyle v. Seawall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doyle v. Seawall, 12 Cal. 425 (Cal. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Field, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., concurring.

This case comes before us on appeal from the final judgment, and from the order denying a new trial. The statement upon which the appellant rests, is the one used upon the motion, and this is not agreed to by the parties or their counsel, or settled by the Judges who tried the case. It has not, therefore, sufficient authentication to constitute any portion of the record which we can notice. The appeal is based upon errors which the statement discloses, and as these cannot be considered, the judgment must be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., concurring.

This case comes before us on appeal from the final judgment, and from the order denying a new trial. The statement upon which the appellant rests, is the one used upon the motion, and this is not agreed to by the parties or their counsel, or settled by the Judges who tried the case. It has not, therefore, sufficient authentication to constitute any portion of the record which we can notice. The appeal is based upon errors which the statement discloses, and as these cannot be considered, the judgment must be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Cal. 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-seawall-cal-1859.