Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp.

415 F. App'x 460

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 8, 2011

DocketNo. 10-1251

StatusPublished

This text of 415 F. App'x 460 (Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp., 415 F. App'x 460 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nancy L. Doyle appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Rite Aid Corporation in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:08-cv-01106-RDB, 2010 WL 445387 (D.Md. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nancy L. Doyle appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Rite Aid Corporation in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:08-cv-01106-RDB, 2010 WL 445387 (D.Md. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 F. App'x 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-rite-aid-corp-ca4-2011.