Doyle v. Rector
This text of 15 N.Y.S. 626 (Doyle v. Rector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment formerly rendered in this action in favor of the defendants was reversed by the court of appeals (23 N. E. Rep. 928) upon errors of law, and now a trial has been had before a referee, and the plaintiff has appealed from the judgment. The testimony is not printed in the case, and it is to be assumed that the facts found are justified by the evidence. That being so, the conclusions of law followed, and the report was justified. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Barnard, P. J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.Y.S. 626, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 888, 60 Hun 586, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-rector-nysupct-1891.