Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Doyle v. Polo Syndications, Inc.

Doyle v. Polo Syndications, Inc.

530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4068, 1988 WL 93726
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 14, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 530 So. 2d 1087 (Doyle v. Polo Syndications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doyle v. Polo Syndications, Inc., 530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4068, 1988 WL 93726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an effort by appellant to institute supplemental proceedings in order to collect upon a final judgment awarding money damages. The supplemental complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and are convinced that the appellant substantially complied with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987) and case law requirements so as to establish jurisdiction. We are further convinced that appellee received abundant procedural due process so that no prejudice occurred so as to constitute reversible error.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., JR., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STANDARD PROP. INV. TRUST, INC. v. Luskin
585 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4068, 1988 WL 93726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-polo-syndications-inc-fladistctapp-1988.