Doyle v. Ohio

423 U.S. 922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doyle v. Ohio. Read the opinion of the Court — 426 U.S. 610
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 3, 1975·No. No. 75-5014; No. 75-5015·Published

Opinion

Ct. App. Ohio, Tus-carawas County. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 823.] Motion to permit Ronald L. Collins, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice on behalf of respondent in both cases granted. Applications for stay of execution and enforcement of judgments and/or bail (Nos. A-94 and A-96), presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doyle v. Ohio, 423 U.S. 922 (1975).

423 U.S. 922 (Doyle v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.