Doyle v. Moulton

New York Supreme Court

Doyle v. Moulton

1 Johns. Cas. 246

DecidedJanuary 15, 1800

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 246 (Doyle v. Moulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doyle v. Moulton, 1 Johns. Cas. 246 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff after a demurrer, comes too [296]*296late to compel the defendant to elect his plea. As to the other part of the motion, the rule referred to merely says, that before the default for not joining in demurrer is entered, the party may amend the pleading demurred to. It does not extend so far, as to allow the party to add new .pléas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff after a demurrer, comes too [296]*296late to compel the defendant to elect his plea. As to the other part of the motion, the rule referred to merely says, that before the default for not joining in demurrer is entered, the party may amend the pleading demurred to. It does not extend so far, as to allow the party to add new .pléas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. Cas. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-moulton-nysupct-1800.