Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.

Sixth Circuit

Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.

239 F. 719, 152 C.C.A. 553, 1 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 753, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 F. 686 →

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 16, 1917·No. No. 2864·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have held the application for rehearing in the expectation that the decision of the Supreme Court in Von Baumbach v. Sargent, 242 U. S. 503, 37 Sup. Ct. 201, 61 L. Ed. -, might affect the reasoning or the conclusions of our opinion in this case. The opinion in that case was announced on January 15, 1917. It does not consider .those features of the case that are here involved, and so does not add to the existing knowledge on those subjects.

The merits of the petition have been considered, and we are not convinced that there was any substantial error in the opinion.

The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have held the application for rehearing in the expectation that the decision of the Supreme Court in Von Baumbach v. Sargent, 242 U. S. 503, 37 Sup. Ct. 201, 61 L. Ed. -, might affect the reasoning or the conclusions of our opinion in this case. The opinion in that case was announced on January 15, 1917. It does not consider .those features of the case that are here involved, and so does not add to the existing knowledge on those subjects.

The merits of the petition have been considered, and we are not convinced that there was any substantial error in the opinion.

The petition is denied.

Doyle v. Mitchell Bros., 239 F. 719, 152 C.C.A. 553, 1 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 753, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270 (6th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

239 F. 719 (Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related