Doyle v. Mayor & Council of Secaucus
This text of 163 A. 893 (Doyle v. Mayor & Council of Secaucus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. However, that opinion in citing the statute of 1911, page 444, omits to note that the statute in forbidding the abolition of a position or office held by an exempt fireman, by the last clause in section 3, limits that inhibition to cases where the reduction is “for the purpose of terminating the service of any such exempt fireman.” In the present case,, there was clearly no such purpose, as found by the Supreme Court; and the absence of that purpose is an essential ground for the judgment of the Supreme Court and for the affirmance here.
For affirmance— The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A. 893, 110 N.J.L. 62, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-mayor-council-of-secaucus-nj-1933.