Doyle v. Hending

Fourth Circuit

Doyle v. Hending

624 F. App'x 107

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2015·No. No. 15-6923·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Hending, No. 5:15-ct-03081-FL (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2015). We deny Doyle’s motion to be heard and his motions for a complete and full discovery of all evidence. We dispense with oral [108] argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Hending, No. 5:15-ct-03081-FL (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2015). We deny Doyle’s motion to be heard and his motions for a complete and full discovery of all evidence. We dispense with oral [108] argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Doyle v. Hending, 624 F. App'x 107 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

624 F. App'x 107 (Doyle v. Hending) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related