Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National Bank
227 A.D. 630
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D. 522 →
Opinion
—Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and [631]*631votes for reversal and a new trial upon the ground that there was proof of bad faith; Hagarty, J., concurs with Lazansky, P. J., but is further of opinion that defendant was guilty of gross negligence within the meaning of the trust indenture.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National Bank, 227 A.D. 630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
227 A.D. 630 (Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.