Doyle v. Barden & Robeson Corp.

37 A.D.3d 1138, 827 N.Y.S.2d 916
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2007
DocketAppeal No. 5
StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.3d 1138 (Doyle v. Barden & Robeson Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doyle v. Barden & Robeson Corp., 37 A.D.3d 1138, 827 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Erin M. Peradotto, J.), entered April 19, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order converted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew to a motion for leave to reargue and, upon re-argument, denied the motion.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Empire Insurance v. Food City, Inc.
167 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.3d 1138, 827 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doyle-v-barden-robeson-corp-nyappdiv-2007.