Doyle v. American Chemical Society
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SHANE JOSEPH BOLAND DOYLE,
Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-2591 (JMC)
v.
AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY,
Defendant.
ORDER
In a May 8, 2025 Minute Order, the Court gave Plaintiff Shane Joseph Boland Doyle,
appearing pro se, until May 23, 2025 to notify it of his continued interest in prosecuting this case,
or risk dismissal of the case. The Court asked Doyle to provide such notice because Doyle had
failed to respond to the Court’s March 24, 2025 order to show cause why mediation would not be
appropriate in this case. Defendant American Chemical Society consented to mediation on April
23, 2025.
To date Doyle has neither complied with the Court’s May 8, 2025 order nor requested
additional time to comply. District courts “have inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for a
plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with a court order.” Angellino v. Royal
Family Al-Saud, 688 F.3d 771, 775 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (quoting Peterson v. Archstone Cmties.
LLC, 637 F.3d 416, 418 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing LCvR 83.23)). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall close the
case.
This is a final appealable Order.
1 __________________________ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge
Date: August 14, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle v. American Chemical Society (Doyle v. American Chemical Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.