Doyle v. American Chemical Society

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 14, 2025·No. Civil Action No. 2022-2591·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHANE JOSEPH BOLAND DOYLE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-2591 (JMC)

v.

AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY,

Defendant.

ORDER

In a May 8, 2025 Minute Order, the Court gave Plaintiff Shane Joseph Boland Doyle,

appearing pro se, until May 23, 2025 to notify it of his continued interest in prosecuting this case,

or risk dismissal of the case. The Court asked Doyle to provide such notice because Doyle had

failed to respond to the Court’s March 24, 2025 order to show cause why mediation would not be

appropriate in this case. Defendant American Chemical Society consented to mediation on April

23, 2025.

To date Doyle has neither complied with the Court’s May 8, 2025 order nor requested

additional time to comply. District courts “have inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for a

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with a court order.” Angellino v. Royal

Family Al-Saud, 688 F.3d 771, 775 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (quoting Peterson v. Archstone Cmties.

LLC, 637 F.3d 416, 418 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing LCvR 83.23)). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall close the

case.

This is a final appealable Order.

1 __________________________ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge

Date: August 14, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doyle v. American Chemical Society, (D.D.C. 2025).

Doyle v. American Chemical Society (Doyle v. American Chemical Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Archstone Communities LLC
637 F.3d 416 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Angellino v. Royal Family Al-Saud
688 F.3d 771 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)