Doyle Smith v. CIR
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 18-3560
Doyle Dennis Smith
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
Appeal from The United States Tax Court
Submitted: August 28, 2019 Filed: September 4, 2019 [Unpublished]
Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Doyle Smith appeals the tax court’s1 dismissal of his petition after he failed to pay the filing fee. Following careful review, we conclude that the tax court did not err in dismissing Smith’s petition. See Tax Ct. Rule 20(d) (fee of $60 shall be paid
1 The Honorable Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court.
at time petition is filed; fee may be waived if petitioner shows inability to pay); Tax Ct. Rule 123(b) (tax court may dismiss case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with Tax Court Rules); Long v. Comm’r, 742 F.2d 1141, 1143 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal under Rule 123(b)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle Smith v. CIR (Doyle Smith v. CIR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.