Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 17, 2013·No. 02-13-00068-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00068-CV

DOYLE L. GARNER AND GILDA M. APPELLANTS GARNER

V.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On September 20, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief had not

been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex.

R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed

with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a), 42.3.

We have not received any response.

Because appellants’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 17, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc. (Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.