Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00068-CV
DOYLE L. GARNER AND GILDA M. APPELLANTS GARNER
V.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On September 20, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief had not
been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex.
R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed
with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a), 42.3.
We have not received any response.
Because appellants’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 17, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc. (Doyle L. Garner and Gilda M. Garner v. Citimortgage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.