Dowsey v. Village of Kensington
222 A.D. 831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dowsey v. Village of Kensington. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 A.D. 746 →
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out separate defenses in amended answer reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that they are insufficient in law upon their face. (Star Co. v. Brush, 185 App. Div. 261; Board, of Education v. Van Zandt, 119 Misc. 124; affd., 204 App. Div. 856; 234 N. Y. 644.) Young, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur; Kapper and Carswell, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 222 A.D. 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
222 A.D. 831 (Dowsey v. Village of Kensington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Bd. of Educ. of the City of Rochester v. . Van Zandt
138 N.E. 481 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Star Co. v. Brush
185 A.D. 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Board of Education v. Van Zandt
204 A.D. 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Board of Education v. Van Zandt
119 Misc. 124 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)