Dowsey v. Dowsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dowsey v. Dowsey

43 A.D.2d 860, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 860 (Dowsey v. Dowsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dowsey v. Dowsey, 43 A.D.2d 860, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding with respect to custody of a child, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 15, 1973, which sustained the writ, awarded custody of the child to petitioner and directed that a warrant of attachment issue against appellants. Judgment affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Gulotta, P. J;-, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur; Martuseello and Latham, JJ., concur in the affirmance as to appellant Dowsey, but otherwise dissent and vote to reverse as to appellant Ennis and to dismiss the petition as to her, on the ground that she has no such custody or control of the child as would enable her to obey an order to produce the chüd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding with respect to custody of a child, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 15, 1973, which sustained the writ, awarded custody of the child to petitioner and directed that a warrant of attachment issue against appellants. Judgment affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Gulotta, P. J;-, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur; Martuseello and Latham, JJ., concur in the affirmance as to appellant Dowsey, but otherwise dissent and vote to reverse as to appellant Ennis and to dismiss the petition as to her, on the ground that she has no such custody or control of the child as would enable her to obey an order to produce the chüd.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 860, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dowsey-v-dowsey-nyappdiv-1974.