Downs v. Henrico County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2007·No. 06-2079·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2079

BEATRICE DOWNS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HENRICO COUNTY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00631-REP)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beatrice Downs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Beatrice Downs appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil complaint because it lacks a basis in law or

fact. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny her motion to expedite her appeal, her motion

to test the contents of her medication, and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Downs v. Henrico County, No 3:06-cv-

00631-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downs v. Henrico County, (4th Cir. 2007).

Downs v. Henrico County (Downs v. Henrico County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.