Downs v. California Board of Prison Terms II

566 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 2719, 183 L. Ed. 2d 66, 80 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2012 WL 1969399, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 4268
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 4, 2012·No. No. 11-9632·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downs v. California Board of Prison Terms II, 566 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 2719, 183 L. Ed. 2d 66, 80 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2012 WL 1969399, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 4268 (2012).

566 U.S. 1032 (Downs v. California Board of Prison Terms II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. White
782 F.3d 1118 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. James Cuneo
554 F. App'x 313 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Terrance Pargo
538 F. App'x 742 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Levi Smith
504 F. App'x 519 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)