Downingtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd ofAssessment

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 12, 2024
Docket679 MAL 2023 (Granted)
StatusPublished

This text of Downingtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd ofAssessment (Downingtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd ofAssessment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Downingtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd ofAssessment, (Pa. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL : No. 678 MAL 2023 DISTRICT : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v. : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF : ASSESSMENT APPEALS TAX PARCEL : NO.: 33-5-43.3 : : : PETITION OF: DOWNINGTOWN AREA : SCHOOL DISTRICT :

DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL : No. 679 MAL 2023 DISTRICT : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v. : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF : ASSESSMENT APPEALS TAX PARCEL : NO.: 33-5-43.2 : : : PETITION OF: DOWNINGTOWN AREA : SCHOOL DISTRICT :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are: (1) Whether the Commonwealth Court Majority incorrectly held that the School District must appeal all potentially underassessed properties in the School District in order to comply with the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution,[ PA. CONST. art. VIII, §1,] which holding is inconsistent with Pennsylvania Supreme Court precedent explicitly recognizing that there will never be perfect uniformity in real estate taxation, and constitutes a wholly impractical requirement?

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court Majority incorrectly held that the School District implemented its tax assessment appeal policy in an arbitrary fashion—where the factual basis for such holding was not established at trial, is explicitly contradicted by the record, and improperly disregards the totality of the trial evidence and testimony—and is inconsistent with the standards set forth by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, as well as Commonwealth Court precedent?

[678 MAL 2023 and 679 MAL 2023] - 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Downingtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd ofAssessment, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downingtown-area-sd-v-chester-cnty-bd-ofassessment-pa-2024.