Downing's Estate
5 Watts 90
Opinion
The appellants have mistaken their course. If they have received injury, their remedy is by petition for a review in the court below. The accountants have no additional matter to exhibit; and while the final decree of confirmation remains unopened, it is conclusive.
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Downing's Estate, 5 Watts 90 (Pa. 1836).
5 Watts 90 (Downing's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hensel v. Integrity Trust Co.
32 Pa. D. & C. 672 (Perry County Court of Common Pleas, 1938)
Mains's Estate
185 A. 222 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Bishop's Appeal
26 Pa. 470 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1856)
In re Seichrist
2 Pa. 432 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1846)
Stœver's Appeal
3 Watts & Serg. 154 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1842)