Downing Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CURTIS LUNDY DOWNING, No. 82810 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ADRIANA ESCOBAR, DISTRICT MAY 1 7 2021 JUDGE, eAN CLERK OF iuehiE COURT
Respondents, EY DEPUIY CLERK
and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
This petition was docketed on April 27, 2021, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 21(g). That same day, this court issued a notice directing petitioner to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 21 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this petition. To date, petitioner has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge SUPREME COURT OF Curtis Lundy Downing NEVADA Attorney General/Carson City CLERK'S ORDER Eighth District Court Clerk (0) 1947 4E*.
?"1- 151?-0
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Downing Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Downing Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.