Downing Vs. Director
This text of Downing Vs. Director (Downing Vs. Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CURTIS LUNDY DOWNING, No. 82870 Appellant, vs. CHARLES DANIELS, DIRECTOR, FILED NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AND THE STATE OF MAY 2 7 202i NEVADA, ELIZP?E' I fr% c CLE ' Respondents. SY DE?ure cLERA
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on May 7, 2021, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPR,EME Coma ELIZABETH A. BROWN
BY: ,
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Curtis Lundy Downing SUPREME COURT OF Attorney General/Carson City NEVADA Eighth District Court Clerk CLERK'S ORDER
4 0) MT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Downing Vs. Director, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-vs-director-nev-2021.