Downing v. United States

99 F. 423, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5024
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 16, 1900·No. No. 2,534·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These are tubes of wrought steel for holding gas under pressure. They seem to be specially provided for as tubes of steel under paragraph 130 of the act of 1894, for “boiler or other tubes” of steel, and consequently not to he manufactures of steel not otherwise provided for, under paragraph 177, as they were assessed. Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downing v. United States, 99 F. 423, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5024 (circtsdny 1900).

99 F. 423 (Downing v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis-Bilt Products Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 332 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)