Downing v. Porter

9 Mass. 386
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The Court

dismissed the appeal on the ground that Downing was not so connected with the estate of the testator, as to be entitled to the appeal, which should have been made by the administrator of the estate of Jabez Porter, as the party interested, and entitled to receive the portion of the personal" estate of the testator which might be payable to Downing in right of his wife, and the others entitled to the personal estate of the said Jabez.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downing v. Porter, 9 Mass. 386 (Mass. 1812).

9 Mass. 386 (Downing v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierce v. Gould
9 N.E. 568 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Cleveland v. Quilty
128 Mass. 578 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Tuxbury
67 Me. 267 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1877)
Reed v. Foster
54 Me. 499 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1867)
Arnold v. Estate of Brooks
36 Vt. 204 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1863)
Clark v. Courser
29 N.H. 170 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1854)
Mathes v. Bennett
21 N.H. 188 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Smith v. Bradstreet
33 Mass. 264 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1834)
Penniman v. French
2 Mass. 140 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1806)