Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company
174 A. 507, 113 N.J.L. 399, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 373
This text of 174 A. 507 (Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company, 174 A. 507, 113 N.J.L. 399, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 373 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 A. 507, 113 N.J.L. 399, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-v-oxweld-acetylene-company-nj-1934.