Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company
174 A. 507, 113 N.J.L. 399, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 373
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company, 174 A. 507, 113 N.J.L. 399, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 373 (N.J. 1934).
174 A. 507 (Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.