Downing v. Jacobs

578 P.2d 243, 99 Idaho 127, 1978 Ida. LEXIS 385
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedMay 2, 1978
Docket12445
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 578 P.2d 243 (Downing v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Downing v. Jacobs, 578 P.2d 243, 99 Idaho 127, 1978 Ida. LEXIS 385 (Idaho 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On March 9, 1976, defendant-appellant Gale Jacobs sold Jake’s Auction, an auction building located in Payette, Idaho, to plaintiff-respondent Marlin Downing. In conjunction with the sale the parties signed a covenant not to compete that provided as follows: “Section 1. Covenant [Appellant] shall not compete with [respondent] by operating an auction house within a 50-mile radius of the city of Payette, Idaho, for a period of two years after the date of this agreement, without the written consent of [respondent].

In November, 1976, appellant attempted to conduct a toy auction in Payette through Jake’s Auction Service, a related business operated as a regional, transitory auctioneer service. Respondent sought to enjoin the toy auction as in violation of the covenant not to compete. The district court restrained appellant from conducting the auction and permanently enjoined appellant from operating future auctions in violation of the covenant. Appellant appeals from the judgment below.

This court may dismiss an appeal when it appears that only a moot question *128 is involved. Tryon v. Baker, 94 Idaho 222, 485 P.2d 964 (1971); Graves v. Berry, 35 Idaho 498, 207 P. 718 (1922). In making this determination, this court may properly consider facts arising after the entry of the judgment appealed. Abels v. Turner Trust Co., 31 Idaho 777, 176 P. 884 (1918).

According to its terms, the covenant not to compete expired on March 9, 1978; that date has passed and the controversy has therefore ceased to exist. Any decision by this court would thus be meaningless and without effect.

Appeal dismissed. No costs allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eguilior v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals, 2018
McHugh v. John Doe (15-11)
Idaho Court of Appeals, 2016
Ryan M. Mitchell v. State of Idaho
369 P.3d 299 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2016)
Caleb Hansen v. Lawerence Denney
346 P.3d 321 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2015)
Johnson v. Johnson
216 P.3d 1284 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Goodson v. Nez Perce County Board
993 P.2d 614 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2000)
Ellibee v. Ellibee
826 P.2d 462 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
George v. Donovan
757 P.2d 651 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1987)
Dick v. Geist
693 P.2d 1133 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1985)
Izatt v. State
661 P.2d 763 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Moon v. INVESTMENT BOARD OF STATE OF IDAHO
627 P.2d 310 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1981)
Kerner v. Johnson
583 P.2d 360 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 P.2d 243, 99 Idaho 127, 1978 Ida. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-v-jacobs-idaho-1978.