Downing v. Harmon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Downing v. Harmon

13 Iowa 535

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedOctober 10, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Iowa 535 (Downing v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Downing v. Harmon, 13 Iowa 535 (iowa 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Wright, J.

These actions were commenced in June, 1861. Defendant appeals, and assigns for error that judgment in each case was entered by default, when the court had no jurisdiction, the return of the officer failing to show due service. The construction given to § 3545, and the reasoning used in the cases of Pigman v. Denny, 12 Iowa, 396, and McKinleys. Bechtel, 11 Id., 561, compel us to affirm these cases. Appellants’ remedy, if any, is by motion in the District Court, and not by appeal, in the first instance, to this.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright, J.

These actions were commenced in June, 1861. Defendant appeals, and assigns for error that judgment in each case was entered by default, when the court had no jurisdiction, the return of the officer failing to show due service. The construction given to § 3545, and the reasoning used in the cases of Pigman v. Denny, 12 Iowa, 396, and McKinleys. Bechtel, 11 Id., 561, compel us to affirm these cases. Appellants’ remedy, if any, is by motion in the District Court, and not by appeal, in the first instance, to this.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Iowa 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-v-harmon-iowa-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack