Downing v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Downing v. Division of Employment Security

270 S.W.3d 440, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 2008·No. WD 69535·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Downing appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming Mr. Downing’s disqualification from receiving certain unemployment benefits. On appeal, he claims the record does not contain competent and substantial evidence to support the finding that his employer discharged Mr. Downing due to misconduct connected with his work. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Downing appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming Mr. Downing’s disqualification from receiving certain unemployment benefits. On appeal, he claims the record does not contain competent and substantial evidence to support the finding that his employer discharged Mr. Downing due to misconduct connected with his work. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Downing v. Division of Employment Security, 270 S.W.3d 440, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

270 S.W.3d 440 (Downing v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related