Downing v. Alexander's Rent A Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Downing v. Alexander's Rent A Cab Corp.

34 A.D.2d 803, 311 N.Y.S.2d 1003

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 803 (Downing v. Alexander's Rent A Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Downing v. Alexander's Rent A Cab Corp., 34 A.D.2d 803, 311 N.Y.S.2d 1003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 16, 1969 in favor of plaintiff, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within 30 days after entry of the order hereon plaintiff shall serve and file with the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict from $180,000 to $125,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so [804]*804reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. We are of the opinion that the verdict is excessive to the extent indicated herein. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 16, 1969 in favor of plaintiff, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within 30 days after entry of the order hereon plaintiff shall serve and file with the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict from $180,000 to $125,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so [804]*804reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. We are of the opinion that the verdict is excessive to the extent indicated herein. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 803, 311 N.Y.S.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-v-alexanders-rent-a-cab-corp-nyappdiv-1970.