Downing Trading Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Downing Trading Corp. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 409, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1844

United States Customs Court·Decided February 17, 1954·No. No. 57863; protest 105131-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In the stipulation of counsel, plaintiff conceded the correctness of the primary classification of the instant merchandise under said paragraph 1005 (a). Counsel for the respective parties further agreed that the 223 rolls of henequen cordage, specified on customs Form 3815, on file with the entry papers, were in bonded warehouse on January 30, 1943, the effective date of T. D. 50797, supra, and were withdrawn from bonded warehouse for consumption after Janu[410]*410ary 30, 1943, before the termination of said trade agreement. Upon the agreed facts, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In the stipulation of counsel, plaintiff conceded the correctness of the primary classification of the instant merchandise under said paragraph 1005 (a). Counsel for the respective parties further agreed that the 223 rolls of henequen cordage, specified on customs Form 3815, on file with the entry papers, were in bonded warehouse on January 30, 1943, the effective date of T. D. 50797, supra, and were withdrawn from bonded warehouse for consumption after Janu[410]*410ary 30, 1943, before the termination of said trade agreement. Upon the agreed facts, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Downing Trading Corp. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 409, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1844 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 409 (Downing Trading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.