Downing Trading Corp. v. United States
This text of 32 Cust. Ct. 409 (Downing Trading Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In the stipulation of counsel, plaintiff conceded the correctness of the primary classification of the instant merchandise under said paragraph 1005 (a). Counsel for the respective parties further agreed that the 223 rolls of henequen cordage, specified on customs Form 3815, on file with the entry papers, were in bonded warehouse on January 30, 1943, the effective date of T. D. 50797, supra, and were withdrawn from bonded warehouse for consumption after Janu[410]*410ary 30, 1943, before the termination of said trade agreement. Upon the agreed facts, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Cust. Ct. 409, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downing-trading-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1954.