Downey v. Nutt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Downey v. Nutt

19 Va. 59, 19 Gratt. 59

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedFebruary 13, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 Va. 59 (Downey v. Nutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Downey v. Nutt, 19 Va. 59, 19 Gratt. 59 (Va. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Moncure, P.,

delivered the judgment of the court: The court is of opinion that for reasons stated in [61]*61the cases of Martin v. Snowden, trustee, Bennett v. Hunter, Portner & Recker v. Cazenove, 18 Gratt. 100; and Turner v. Smith, &c., Id. 830, which'rule this case, there is no error in the said judgment. Therefore, it is considered that the same he affirmed, and that the defendant recover of the plaintiff thirty dollars damages, and also his costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended; which is ordered to be certified, &c.

Erras, J., dissented.

Judgment appirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moncure, P.,

delivered the judgment of the court: The court is of opinion that for reasons stated in [61]*61the cases of Martin v. Snowden, trustee, Bennett v. Hunter, Portner & Recker v. Cazenove, 18 Gratt. 100; and Turner v. Smith, &c., Id. 830, which'rule this case, there is no error in the said judgment. Therefore, it is considered that the same he affirmed, and that the defendant recover of the plaintiff thirty dollars damages, and also his costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended; which is ordered to be certified, &c.

Erras, J., dissented.

Judgment appirmed.

James G. Mallas Robert v. Jones, Jr., and John W. Flint Perry Brunk Peoples Supply Company, Incorporated Omega Energy, Incorporated Revel, Incorporated Trinity Properties, Incorporated Genesis Leases, Incorporated Star Cross Properties, Incorporated v. United States of America, and Alvin H. Kolak Joanne D. Miller William H. Ball Paul G. Topolka Jack D. Yarbrough Fred T. Goldberg, Jr. Alan I. Weinberg Larry L. Davis Robert Forrest Internal Revenue Service, James G. Mallas Robert v. Jones, Jr., and John W. Flint Perry Brunk Peoples Supply Company, Incorporated Omega Energy, Incorporated Revel, Incorporated Trinity Properties, Incorporated Genesis Leases, Incorporated Star Cross Properties, Incorporated v. United States of America, and Alvin H. Kolak Joanne D. Miller William H. Ball Paul G. Topolka Jack D. Yarbrough Fred T. Goldberg, Jr. Alan I. Weinberg Larry L. Davis Robert Forrest Internal Revenue Service

993 F.2d 1111 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

State ex rel. Rosenblatt v. Sargent

12 Mo. App. 228 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Va. 59, 19 Gratt. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/downey-v-nutt-va-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack